首页> 外文OA文献 >A systematic review of techniques and effects of\ud self-help interventions for tinnitus: application of\ud taxonomies from health psychology
【2h】

A systematic review of techniques and effects of\ud self-help interventions for tinnitus: application of\ud taxonomies from health psychology

机译:对\ ud的技术和效果的系统评价 耳鸣自助干预:\ ud的应用 健康心理学分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Self-help interventions are followed by people independently with minimal or no therapist contact. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of self-help interventions for adults with chronic tinnitus and systematically identify the self-help techniques used. Design: Systematic review and application of health psychology taxonomies. Electronic database searches were conducted, supplemented by citation searching and hand-searching of key journals. Prospective controlled trials, which used measures of tinnitus distress, functional management, anxiety, depression, and quality of life, were included. Michie et al’s behaviour change techniques (BCTs) taxonomy and Taylor et al’s PRISMS taxonomy of self-management components were applied to describe interventions. Study sample: Five studies were included, providing low-to-moderate levels of evidence. Results: Randomized controlled trial studies were too few and heterogeneous for meta-analysis to be performed. Studies comparing self-help interventions to therapist-guided interventions and assessing non tinnitus-specific psychosocial outcomes and functional management were lacking. Fifteen BCTs and eight self-management components were identified across interventions. Conclusions: A lack of high-quality and homogeneous studies meant that confident conclusions could not be drawn regarding the efficacy of self-help interventions for tinnitus. Better reporting and categorization of intervention techniques is needed for replication in research and practice and to facilitate understanding of intervention mechanisms.
机译:目标:自助干预措施由独立的人进行,只有很少或没有治疗师接触。这篇综述旨在评估自助治疗对慢性耳鸣成人的有效性,并系统地确定所使用的自助技术。设计:健康心理学分类法的系统评价和应用。进行了电子数据库搜索,并以引文搜索和手工搜索关键期刊为补充。包括前瞻性对照试验,该试验采用了耳鸣困扰,功能管理,焦虑,抑郁和生活质量的措施。 Michie等人的行为改变技术(BCT)分类法和Taylor等人的自我管理成分的PRISMS分类法用于描述干预措施。研究样本:包括五项研究,提供了中低水平的证据。结果:随机对照试验研究太少且异质,无法进行荟萃分析。缺乏将自助干预与治疗师指导的干预进行比较,以及评估非耳鸣特定的社会心理结果和功能管理的研究。在所有干预措施中,确定了15个BCT和8个自我管理组件。结论:缺乏高质量且均一的研究意味着无法就自助干预耳鸣的功效得出可靠的结论。为了在研究和实践中进行复制并促进对干预机制的理解,需要更好地报告和分类干预技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号